Evaluation forum
Evaluation forum
当前位置: Website homepage > News Center > Evaluation forum1. Ambiguous legal ownership
In the traditional perspective of intangible assets evaluation, the cost method cannot reflect the potential social value and economic value that data assets can bring, and the cost of data assets is also incomplete and weakly corresponding; However, the idea of income method is difficult to accurately predict the data asset itself and the future income amount, and it is difficult to find a suitable risk index in the short term because of the uniqueness of its data; The market approach is mainly affected by the fact that China's data asset transaction is still in the initial stage of development, the lack of effective comparable cases and the adjustment of comparable parameters of data assets are far more complex than general assets.
2. For the WVI model in the idea of monetary measurement, some evaluation factors are mainly affected by the judgment of subjective factors, and the reverse demonstration of data value also needs the combination of other methods. However, the RVI model also has the risk factor judgment that is easily affected by subjective judgment, and different evaluation methods will have great differences in the quantification of risk, thus affecting the results of the model.
3. For the IVI model in the non-monetary measurement idea, this idea does not consider the correlation between data and business or actual business objectives, and the evaluation value is of low reference value for management decisions; The disadvantage of BVI model is that the analysis of business relevance is subjective, and it needs a time-consuming data use analysis to judge the support and promotion of data to business; In the PVI model, it is difficult to control the external variables to obtain accurate results. The evaluation value is greatly affected by the external environment, and can only be evaluated after the actual application of the data, so it has great limitations.
4. As for the "data potential" evaluation idea, the estimation of most key indicators is too dependent on the subjective judgment of a few experts, and often for individual special data assets, these expert standard indicators can not accurately reflect the unique socio-economic value of data assets, which will lead to the deviation between the value evaluation results of data assets and their true value results.
5. From the perspective of post-evaluation, it is necessary to combine a large number of blockchain and big data technologies as well as a large number of computer talents, integrate computer talents and evaluation talents, and jointly develop the post-evaluation system. The process requires a lot of costs and coordination, and the transaction cases of circulation data market in the current society are not very rich, Therefore, there is also a lack of practicality in adjusting and verifying the post-evaluation system.